Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 03:43
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Why did we evolve to have so many nerve endings in our anuses?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Would you date a Muslim guy? Why/why not?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
Need a different reason to eat more fiber? How about microplastics? - The Seattle Times
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
'Razor blade throat', a stabbing pain, might hint at infection from new Covid strain - WION
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Origami structures unfold into seamless surfaces for deployable applications - Phys.org
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years: